Tiada Sebutan Kes Scorpene Di Perancis??

Tinggalkan komen

Tiada Sebutan Kes Scorpene Di Perancis??

Biar betul!! Takde langsung sebutan kes perbicaraan berkenaan Scorpene di Mahkamah Perancis?? Ha ha ha ha ha ha!! Sekali lagi rakyat Malaysia terus ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu dan ditipu lagi oleh Nuar Berahem dan Pakatan Biawak…

KUALA LUMPUR: A prominent French Government prosecutor has denied reports circulating among some Malaysian online news portals of an ongoing trial in France, on allegations of corruption by a French company over the purchase of two French-made Scorpene submarines by Malaysia in 2002.

Yves Charpenel said the media in Malaysia should be able to distinguish between rumours and facts, and between investigations and a trial.

“I am aware about all the fuss kicked up by certain media (organisations) in Malaysia over this matter but what I can say is that this is nothing more than a trial by the media,” he told Bernama here on Monday.

Charpenel, who was a former head of prosecution in France and now a state prosecutor and an executive member of the International Association of Anti-Corruption Authorities (IAACA), was here to attend the four-day IAACA conference and general meeting which ended Sunday.

Following a complaint filed in 2009 by Suaram, a Malaysian human rights non-governmental organisation (NGO), that a French company had allegedly paid bribes to a Malaysian firm for the submarine deal, he revealed that two independent “investigating judges” started their investigations earlier this year.

Charpenel said that in France, as in other countries practising the rule of law, all investigations were done in absolute secret.

He said, it was anybody’s right to file a complaint and due to the secret nature of the investigations, some resorted to complaining to the media.

He explained that for specific cases in France, the Justice Ministry would ask an independent judge, called an “investigating judge”, to investigate.

“He is just an investigator. This is an old system that started from the Napolean era. If the investigating judge wants someone to come to Malaysia, he has to ask from your government because we have what is called the Treaty of Mutual Legal Assistance. And the Malaysian government can say ‘yes’ or ‘no’. It has to be decided by the Malaysian authorities.

“A French investigating judge cannot take his luggage, take a plane and go to Malaysia and ask someone to answer his questions. It is impossible, it is against the French law and it is also against international law,” stressed Charpenel. He pointed out that in France, as elsewhere, the course of justice would not be dictated by the media

“In France, the time of justice is different from the time in media. Of course, the media needs data, information, news. It’s natural but the investigation is quite different. This is exactly the same, whether in France or in Malaysia.

“And, it has to be secret. We are now in the first step, maybe, we got another step, maybe not, and it is quite early to say more.”

Asked about media reports that French lawyers representing Suaram in the suit would be coming to Malaysia to brief their clients, Charpenel said any lawyer from any country was free to do so because he was paid by his clients.

“He can speak freely to the press, that’s freedom or human rights. But he is not a prosecutor. He is not an investigating judge. He is not an official.” In April this year, local Opposition politicians here had even called for Malaysian officials to testify in Paris or risk being ostracised in the European Union.

“A trial is a trial with all the rules. Investigation is another thing,” said Charpenel of the misinformation generated by certain news portals over allegations that a trial was already underway.

Defence Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi also said over the weekend that the Auditor-General had declared the Scorpene deal was done in accordance with legal procedures. – Bernama

Jadi kepada rakyat Malaysia masih belum serik ditipu oleh Anwar, silakan tadah kepala anda untuk dikencing oleh Nuar Berahem dan juak-juaknya kagi pada masa akan datang… Pastikan kepala korang berbau hancing masam dan hanyir sebagai menandakan kejayaan Nuar Berahem dan juak-juaknya menipu anda…. Tahniah!!

Pencacai Pakatan Haprak Kuciwa Tahap Gila Tapir!

Ulasan Dimatikan pada Pencacai Pakatan Haprak Kuciwa Tahap Gila Tapir!

Cybertrooper Pakatan Haprak Kuciwa Fitnah Kantoi!!

Seperti yang dijangka permainan fitnah Cybertrooper Pakatan Haprak menemui jalan buntu apabila Polis Perancis mendedahkan… TIDAK ADA INDIVIDU BERNAMA ALTANTUYA SHARIIBU MEMASUKI PERANCIS DALAM TEMPOH TAHUN 1999 – 2006…



PETALING JAYA: A French police investigation has revealed that a person named Altantuya Shaariibuu has never entered France from 1999 to 2006.

Their investigation finds that there are no immigration records of an “Altantuya Shaariibuu” entering France in that period, raising a red flag on the existence of a photograph of the Mongolian, Najib Tun Razak and Abdul Razak Baginda in Paris, allegedly taken between 2004 and 2006.

This is revealed in confidential investigative documents submitted to the French judicial inquiry which is looking into alleged kickbacks in the Scorpene submarine deal between French firm DCNS and the Malaysian government.

The French investigation also revealed that there are no immigration records to show that Prime Minister Najib and his close aide Abdul Razak had entered France from 1999 to 2006.

However, another investigative document revealed that Najib, then a defence minister, and Abdul Razak were part of an official entouarge to Paris from June 16 to June 18, 2000.

Najib made further visits to France in July 2001, July 2003, June 2005 and October 2007 but it is possible that Najib and his entourage could have entered France through diplomatic channel.

The confidential documents also revealed that DCNS officials had also informed French police that they never met a person named Altantuya and do not know who she is in the course of their negotiations for the Scorpene deal.

The DCNS officials had further informed the French police that the negotiations for the submarines were done in Malaysia and not in France.

One official – DCNS’ former sales manager to Malaysia Fredric Faura – told the French investigators the negotiations were in English and not in French, so there is no need for an interpreter.

Furthermore, Altantuya did not speak French so she could not have acted as an English-French interpreter.

He also alluded that he had not met or known Altantuya.

“You ask me if Altantuya was present at these meetings; I say that all Malaysians have perfect English and an interpreter is unnecessary,” was his response to a question by the French police.

Likewise, Jasbir Singh Chahl, who is reported by Malaysian NGO Suaram as being the first Malaysian to be subpoenaed as a witness in the Scorpene case, also told the French police that he has never met Altantuya and that she was not involved in the submarine negotiations.

What photo?

If there are no records of Altantuya entering France, questions are bound to rise over the so-called photo being taken of herself, Najib and Abdul Razak in Paris.

At a press conference held by Altantuya’s father Setev in Kuala Lumpur on April 10, he claimed that he had seen the said photograph. He said that his daughter had showed him the photograph, and that “a lot of witnesses have seen this picture”.

That was the last time he had seen his daughter as she was later found murdered by being shot in her head and her remains blown up with C4 explosives in October 2006.

Abdul Razak – the owner of Perimekar Sdn Bhd and the middleman in the submarine deal – was charged with two Special Action Squad members — Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azhar Umar — over Altantuya’s murder but he was subsequently acquitted of a charge of abetment.

His co-accused were found guilty and sentenced to death. As part of his defence, Abdul Razak had admitted that Altantuya was his lover since 2004, and that they had parted ways the next year.

Setev is now claiming that his daughter’s murder was linked to the submarine deal.

On June 4, international journalist Roger Mitton wrote in a Cambodian newspaper that “soon after meeting her in Hong Kong, Abdul Razak took her off to tour Europe in his red Ferrari, wining and dining at all the best spots and finally ending up in Paris where they met Najib”.

In fact, ever since Altantuya’s remains were recovered in the early hours of Oct 19, 2006, Najib’s detractors had jumped onto the bandwagon to link him to the murder, allegedly over the submarine deal.

Many opposition leaders have claimed that they were aware of the photograph which showed Najib, Abdul Razak and Altantuya being together in Paris but so far the photo has not surfaced anywhere.

Nevertheless, they continue to link Najib to her murder, despite the prime minister’s vehement denials of even meeting her, let alone knowing her.

Suaram has successfully sought for a judicial inquiry at the Tribunal De Grande Instance in Paris to probe alleged corruption crimes and illegal bribes involving top officials from both Malaysia and France in the submarine deal.

Suaram claims that DCNS had paid bribery amounting to 114 million euros to Perimekar, with help from Altantuya, who was later gruesomely murdered for allegedly asking a part of the bribe.

Source: K Kabilah, FMT


Sudah pasti Milo Suam… Eh silap… Milo Basi akan meroyan… Disebabkan kuciwa apabila fitnah tak menjadik… Sudah semestinya Amenoworld akan cari jalan nak pusing cerita… Keh keh keh keh…